In the "are you effing kidding me" news

#61
Jokes aside, the thing about alcoholism is that it's hard for some people to have sympathy because, while it is a disease, it is one of the relatively few diseases that is self-inflicted. Like, you might be genetically predisposed towards alcoholism, but you're never going to wake up with alcoholism, in the same way that you could wake up with, say, a tumor, or Graves' disease. Even accounting for hereditary and environmental factors, alcoholism is still something that you pretty much have to make happen to yourself, which impacts many peoples' (myself included) ability to have empathy.
Type 2 diabetes, heart disease could also be considered "self-inflicted." It is a tough topic and I am not trying to take a personal shot. But as someone who has been dealing with substance abuse in my family, I think disease is about as good as a description as there is. Hopefully Ty gets the help he needs and the Kings get help with their messaging. The Character line was so stupid.
 

Krunker

Northernmost Kings Fan
#64
Type 2 diabetes, heart disease could also be considered "self-inflicted." It is a tough topic and I am not trying to take a personal shot. But as someone who has been dealing with substance abuse in my family, I think disease is about as good as a description as there is. Hopefully Ty gets the help he needs and the Kings get help with their messaging. The Character line was so stupid.
There is a big genetic component to type 2 diabetes, there are super healthy athletes that have developed T2 so I'd argue it's not necessarily self-inflicted. Sorry I know this is totally off-topic, but as a type 1 diabetic I feel obligated to chime in :)
 
#65
There is a big genetic component to type 2 diabetes, there are super healthy athletes that have developed T2 so I'd argue it's not necessarily self-inflicted. Sorry I know this is totally off-topic, but as a type 1 diabetic I feel obligated to chime in :)
And as a type 1 diabetic you know heart disease sort of goes with territory without being self-inflicted. Had a stent nearly twenty years ago. My doctor said by the book I shouldn't have any heart disease, wasn't overweight and in fairly decent shape, but he continued saying diabetics don't go by the book. You could tell by the cardiologist's face that it shocked him when I failed the stress test.

Just adding a little chiming in myself.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#68
He was never brought to a judge for a warrant. For the record, I am an alcoholic who happens to be a psychiatrist. That's an MD type person with 12 years of education post high school. I have experienced alcoholism and treated it. I have treated drug abusers on up to heroin abusers in a methadone clinic. I have treated court ordered people who were diagnosed by the legal system and wasted a lot of time on someone who could not benefit from treatment because he/she didn't need it. I have seen no data that says Ty is an alcoholic. He was arrested for drunk driving unless I am missing something. I probably am.

I have no compassion for drunk drivers. It's a choice. If anyone thinks drinking to the point of alcoholism is a choice, think again. I went down the typical jock route. I got bombed after games and had a great time. I drove drunk. By the simple definition that an alcoholic is someone whose drinking causes him a trouble in life, there are a lot of alcoholics on this forum. How many of you have driven drunk? I evolved into something worse from what I, perhaps with some denial involved, gradually switched from a post game drinker to an everyday drinker. .

Man, we quickly forgot that Darren beat his wife. Why? It's a subject for elsewhere.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#69
He was never brought to a judge for a warrant. For the record, I am an alcoholic who happens to be a psychiatrist. That's an MD type person with 12 years of education post high school. I have experienced alcoholism and treated it. I have treated drug abusers on up to heroin abusers in a methadone clinic. I have treated court ordered people who were diagnosed by the legal system and wasted a lot of time on someone who could not benefit from treatment because he/she didn't need it. I have seen no data that says Ty is an alcoholic. He was arrested for drunk driving unless I am missing something. I probably am.

I have no compassion for drunk drivers. It's a choice. If anyone thinks drinking to the point of alcoholism is a choice, think again. I went down the typical jock route. I got bombed after games and had a great time. I drove drunk. By the simple definition that an alcoholic is someone whose drinking causes him a trouble in life, there are a lot of alcoholics on this forum. How many of you have driven drunk? I evolved into something worse from what I, perhaps with some denial involved, gradually switched from a post game drinker to an everyday drinker. .

Man, we quickly forgot that Darren beat his wife. Why? It's a subject for elsewhere.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/13367938/nba-ty-lawson-battle-addiction
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#70
That's a good article. Thanks Does he sound like a man of bad character? I am addressing this to anyone interested. He needs a baby sitter of sorts but ultimately he will sink or swim on his own. It ain't easy. I wish him luck as a human being. Is this a man of poor character? It's something to debate about and ultimately it will be Vivek/Vlade's decision.

If you judge him as having a bad character because he is an alcoholic, a person who is a bad influence on the team, you would consider me such also. It's not so cut and dried especially if whatever TMZ thinks he did doesn't involve substance use. Some people are irresponsible and that can be part of alcoholism, of course, but it also can be just the way it is with this individual.

I find people who are involved in a 3 AM fight on the streets of New York as more of a problem. It is no way of preparing for the next game and THAT is a problem with at least two of the ex-Kings contribution to the Kings' culture.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#72
Yeah, cause those types of things were oh so common during Cousins 7 years in Sac, right? It's interesting what some are willing to look past and tolerate and what they're not.
I am a huge Boogie fan unless your memory is like mine. I was shocked he was on the streets of New York at that hour although there is no way of knowing what he does late at night. I'm not sure I want my team leader doing that. I honestly don't get your point vis a vis me.



Addendum: I don't look past early morning tussles that end in punches being thrown and perhaps that was the straw that broke Vlade's back as both parties are gone.
 
Last edited:

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#73
That's a good article. Thanks Does he sound like a man of bad character? I am addressing this to anyone interested. He needs a baby sitter of sorts but ultimately he will sink or swim on his own. It ain't easy. I wish him luck as a human being. Is this a man of poor character? It's something to debate about and ultimately it will be Vivek/Vlade's decision.

If you judge him as having a bad character because he is an alcoholic, a person who is a bad influence on the team, you would consider me such also. It's not so cut and dried especially if whatever TMZ thinks he did doesn't involve substance use. Some people are irresponsible and that can be part of alcoholism, of course, but it also can be just the way it is with this individual.

I find people who are involved in a 3 AM fight on the streets of New York as more of a problem. It is no way of preparing for the next game and THAT is a problem with at least two of the ex-Kings contribution to the Kings' culture.
I don't know him so I cannot judge his character. I do not think he's a bad person, however. I think he has demons he needs help dealing with. I'm hoping the whole thing is a tempest in a teapot.

As far as the 3 a.m. thing goes? It was midnight California time, which is barely evening for people whose work schedules are as complicated as NBA players.

You made a good point, however. It's not my decision to make. That task falls on the shoulders of Vlade and Vivek and the rest of the owners...and for that I am grateful. I wouldn't want to have that kind of power/responsibility.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#74
Here is the latest from TMZ:

"Ty Lawson broke the terms of his probation by testing positive for alcohol THREE TIMES over the past 7 months ... this according to court docs obtained by TMZ Sports.

As we previously reported, the Sacramento Kings star is on probation stemming from his 2015 drunk driving case in Denver ... and part of the terms required Lawson to stay completely sober and submit to alcohol testing.

But officials say Lawson tested positive for booze on 9/27, 9/29 and 2/7.

FYI, the Kings had the day off on 2/7 in between two home games.

Lawson spoke with reporters at Kings Media Day on Sept. 26 ... giving interviews about his troubled past, including the drunk driving arrest ... and vowing to move forward.

The next day, officials say he tested positive for booze.

Officials want the judge to revoke Lawson's probation and subject him to harsher punishment -- which includes jail time.

A court date has been set for March 22 -- the same day the Kings play the Bucks -- and if he doesn't show, a warrant will be issued for his arrest."​
 

SacTownKid

Hall of Famer
#75
Sounds like the previous judge did him a favor with the sentencing so I'm sure they won't take to kindly to him breaking the terms of his probation.
 

Capt. Factorial

trifolium contra tempestatem subrigere certum est
Staff member
#76
I'm still very confused about what is going on here. The March 22nd court date does not appear to have been set in response to Lawson's alleged probation violations - it is the last date of his probation sentence and was presumably set a year ago. Furthermore, if Lawson violated his probation twice back in September, why would officials wait until two weeks before the end of his probation to do anything about it? I feel like we have a poor understanding of what is actually going on, and that there is either misinformation or missing information to blame for that poor understanding.
 
#77
i have no problem with lawson drinking or drinking regularly as long as:

a) it doesn't affect his performance on court or his commitments to the team
b) he doesnt put himself in a position to harm others

this whole thing is where it is because of his probation order which doesnt acknowledge the fact that Lawson is a functioning alcoholic. The court wants him to cut alcohol out of his life which simply isnt going to happen, we are talking about one of the most socially acceptable drugs in society here. Simply put the system is setting him up for failure and he may very well become another statistic.

I work in professional industry's with people of immense character, education and status. You'd be surprised how many of them are functioning alcoholics. All get the job done, at high levels, consistently and Lawson has demonstrated that through his own self regulation, whilst not cutting out alcohol entirely, he can perform as such.
 
#78
I'm still very confused about what is going on here. The March 22nd court date does not appear to have been set in response to Lawson's alleged probation violations - it is the last date of his probation sentence and was presumably set a year ago. Furthermore, if Lawson violated his probation twice back in September, why would officials wait until two weeks before the end of his probation to do anything about it? I feel like we have a poor understanding of what is actually going on, and that there is either misinformation or missing information to blame for that poor understanding.
Does it have something to do with the fact that he was back in Colorado for the game against the nuggets? I don't know how these things really work.
 

Glenn

Hall of Famer
#79
I'm still very confused about what is going on here. The March 22nd court date does not appear to have been set in response to Lawson's alleged probation violations - it is the last date of his probation sentence and was presumably set a year ago. Furthermore, if Lawson violated his probation twice back in September, why would officials wait until two weeks before the end of his probation to do anything about it? I feel like we have a poor understanding of what is actually going on, and that there is either misinformation or missing information to blame for that poor understanding.
His first two violations were a couple weeks after he signed with the Kings. That's just a curiosity I suppose but I wonder if the Kings were informed. It's odd though. If he violated 7 months ago (?) why did they wait? Is that the way the legal system works? This part of the saga has nothing to do with the NBA.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#80
Reminder: We don't know the facts yet. His lawyer has refuted the TMZ article. At this point, I think it's only fair to Lawson to wait and see what actually happens.
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#83
Sactown Royalty‏Verified account@sactownroyalty 20m20 minutes ago
Ty Lawson pleads Not Guilty to Probation Violation

At today’s hearing, Lawson pleaded not guilty to violating his probation. As a result, a probation revocation hearing has been set for May 4th, 2017 at which point the judge will decide whether Lawson has violated his probation or not. If Lawson is found to have been in violation of his probation, he could be subject to jail time.
http://www.sactownroyalty.com/2017/...uilty-to-probation-violation-sacramento-kings
 

VF21

Super Moderator Emeritus
SME
#84
According to Jesse Paul of the Denver Post, Lawson, through his attorney Harvey Steinberg, entered a denial of probation violations. Lawson tested positive for alcohol three times in the past year, according to published reports. If true, it would be a violation of his probation.

http://www.csnbayarea.com/kings/kin...lations?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Jesse Aaron Paul‏Verified account@JesseAPaul 3h3 hours ago
Lawson, through his attorney, entered a denial of the probation violations. He is due back in court in about six weeks.

Jesse Aaron Paul‏Verified account@JesseAPaul 3h3 hours ago
Steinberg: "We want to get on that SmartStart so Mr. Lawson can prove" he's not using alcohol.

Jesse Aaron Paul‏Verified account@JesseAPaul 3h3 hours ago
Lawson didn't speak during the brief hearing. He stood flanked by Steinberg. A few people in court recognized him

Jesse Aaron Paul‏Verified account@JesseAPaul 2h2 hours ago
CX: The SmartStart wouldn't be for Lawson's vehicle. It would just be something he would have that would periodically test him.