[Grades] Grades v. Timberwolves 11/27/2015

Does Karl survive December?

  • Yes

    Votes: 30 60.0%
  • No

    Votes: 20 40.0%

  • Total voters
    50
  • Poll closed .
J

jdbraver

Guest
#61
Nope.

The luck in this is fans such as yourself, who are lucky Cuz became ill and Malone got fired, can then sit there and falsely attempt to argue what we had a year ago was luck and overachieving.

Those who understood what we were doing knew damn well that style of play was far more sustainable than our current up and down, live by the jumper and don't concern yourself with defense style.

P.S. It's not living in the past when the firing of Malone is what necessitated the current situation. And when the franchise hasn't recovered from it, it's relevant.
What exactly do you want? Another 3 or 4 coaches? A new one every month? Well guess what it ain't happening and we aren't turning our lousy roster overnight. Not sure if you noticed but we have one good player and a bunch of spare parts. And when our one player is out it's horrific. Players win in this league not coaches. And that outstanding coach is 6-10 this year
 

gunks

Hall of Famer
#62
Howbout one good coach?

And this roster is probably as good as any we've had in years. Yes, there are holes (most glaringly at SG), but we have talent on this squad. And depth.

We were beating better teams with a lesser roster last season, due to coaching. We are losing games this season, due to coaching.

Pace and small ball is killing us. That's on George.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#63
What exactly do you want? Another 3 or 4 coaches? A new one every month?
Yes, I want a new coach every month. That's exactly what myself and others have argued for.

Or, how about doing it the old fashioned way, having the GM hire the coach and hire a coach who understands this roster and makes defense a priority.

Not sure if you noticed but we have one good player and a bunch of spare parts.
What we have is the most talented team this city has seen in close to a decade led by two All Star level players and a well above average 3rd wheel if used correctly.

Not sure if you watch this team.
 

origkds

What- Me Worry?
#64
Go Kings
What exactly do you want? Another 3 or 4 coaches? A new one every month? Well guess what it ain't happening and we aren't turning our lousy roster overnight. Not sure if you noticed but we have one good player and a bunch of spare parts. And when our one player is out it's horrific. Players win in this league not coaches. And that outstanding coach is 6-10 this year
I think you forgot to put a smiley face after this comment so everyone would know that you were making an attempt at humor.
 
#65
What exactly do you want? Another 3 or 4 coaches? A new one every month? Well guess what it ain't happening and we aren't turning our lousy roster overnight. Not sure if you noticed but we have one good player and a bunch of spare parts. And when our one player is out it's horrific. Players win in this league not coaches. And that outstanding coach is 6-10 this year
That outstanding coach is doing more with less than our current coach.
 
J

jdbraver

Guest
#66
Yes, I want a new coach every month. That's exactly what myself and others have argued for.

Or, how about doing it the old fashioned way, having the GM hire the coach and hire a coach who understands this roster and makes defense a priority.


What we have is the most talented team this city has seen in close to a decade led by two All Star level players and a well above average 3rd wheel if used correctly.

Not sure if you watch this team.
I can sure see the talent when cuz is out. I'm not sure if you have watched this team. Perhaps you have an overinflated view of the rest of the team?
 
K

KingMilz

Guest
#67
What exactly do you want? Another 3 or 4 coaches? A new one every month? Well guess what it ain't happening and we aren't turning our lousy roster overnight. Not sure if you noticed but we have one good player and a bunch of spare parts. And when our one player is out it's horrific. Players win in this league not coaches. And that outstanding coach is 6-10 this year
6-11 now and his team scored a record low 5 points in the 3rd quarter against the Mavericks
 
#68
I feel like you answered your own question, with the first eight words of your sentence: if your best player is always bringing up the rear of your offense, you should want to consider recalibrating your offense. Koufos isn't particularly fast, either, and the fact that he played for Karl before really does **** all to divert from that. The one big we have who is fast enough for Karl's system is the one he seems to want to have nothing to do with.

Then he's hustling backwards. When Rondo's on the court, we need less ballhandling and playmaking, because Rondo's going to dominate the ball, anyway. And, if he's not, he's being misused. When Rondo is out there, we need more guys on the floor who are going to rim-run, rim-protect, and can cover both ends of a switch. Collison is the opposite of that.
The biggest problem with Karl's small ball system is the two point guards part. If he insists on going small, then the small that he needs to go with should be Rondo, Belinelli, Casspi, Gay and Cauley-Stein. That would optimize your need for playmaking, without sacrificing too much on the defensive end.
Well Cousins puts up pretty good stats this season, so we might take into consideration, that the offense we are running does fit his strengths to a certain point. Koufos is a very good hustling and rim running big, who makes quick decisions, so he fits Karls vision of how to play a game very well.

I already said that I don't like the Rondo+Collison lineup. So we agree on this point.
 
#69
I would agree that Willie is limited on the offensive side of the ball, but he's not totally inept. Let me ask you a question. How many times was Willie wide open under the basket last night and either no one saw him, or they did and chose not to pass him the ball. I was curious, so I focused totally on Willie when he was on the floor, and not counting the times he did get the ball and scored, there were seven other times that he was either wide open, or open enough for a good pass to get through. One time in particular in the fourth quarter he grabbed a rebound, passed the ball to Collison and then shot down the floor. It appeared that no one on the T Wolves noticed him standing right under the basket with no one within 15 feet of him. Unfortunately, Collison didn't notice him either.

I realize he's not the first option or even the fourth option, but he is someone I think you have to be aware of if your the PG on the team because of his ability to beat just about anyone down the floor. I agree that Casspi has done a better than expected job with his rebounding. And right now he's a better offensive player. But it doesn't have to be an either/or with Casspi and WCS. They can play together. What would have been wrong with having both Koufos and Willie on the floor together to close out the game. Particularly when the T Wolves were getting too many scores at the basket. Mostly thanks to our lousy perimeter defense and lack of weak side help. Something Willie is very good at. We're losing games because we can't stop the other team. Stop the other team, and you'll get easier baskets at the other end.
Willie is limited on offense not inept. We don't find him for lobs and when he rolls to the basket. This is why I said, that I don't know, if Willies poor offensive performances are because of coaching or lacking confidence.
But Willie is a rookie and right now it looks like we see the same old thing, that happened to all Kings rookies outside of Cuz - lack of development. Willie had a full training camp. He shouldn't be this lost on offense, he should have learned how to fight for position for rebounds. We are not talking about rookie mistakes like leaving the floor on pumpfakes. He looks like he lacks basketball fundamentals like boxing out your man. And this is worrying. I don't blame the player, but our coaching staff for this. That's their job - improve the talent we have on this roster.

Did you really miss Willie during the first quarter of tonights game versus the Warriors, when we actually defended them well until Steph got ticky tack calls and hit a couple of contested jumpshots?
Did Willie help us to slow them down in the second half?
Like Ben Willie has to earn his minutes and to do that, he has to be a defensive stopper and a force on the glass. Once I have the impression, that he is just that and still gets pulled out of the game by Karl I will happily join the majority of users here and complain about our stupid old man coaching this team the wrong way.
But I won't complain just because some kind of basketball ideology like "go big all the time", when your bigs seem to be unable to play big (in Willies case) or are both unable to guard the perimeter (like KK and Cuz) and we get crushed from the outside because of it and all of our advantage in the paint gets negated by it.
You have Duncan and Aldridge with West as a backup? Of course you play big, because every big man is able to space the floor, punish smaller guys in the post and take advantage at the glass.
You have KK, Willie and Cuz? Well now Cuz turns into a floor spacer, because KK and Willie have no jumpshot. And still people are complaining, that Cuz is misused by the coach, because he is not planted in the already overcrowded post.
And what's even worse - Willie is unable to abuse his smaller opponent on the glass.

No offense and I actually like big man, smashmouth basketball, but I have a hard time understanding how we should play this way in todays NBA with the roster we got right now.
Teach Willie how to hit a 15 foot jumper and suddenly things look way different. But instead we are teaching him to completely stay out of the way on offense and to be afraid to even touch the ball.
That's beyond me.
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#70
Well Cousins puts up pretty good stats this season, so we might take into consideration, that the offense we are running does fit his strengths to a certain point. Koufos is a very good hustling and rim running big, who makes quick decisions, so he fits Karls vision of how to play a game very well.
Considered, and rejected. Cousins could put up 25/10 in damned near any coach's offense. That's not a validation of the offense, it's a validation of his talent. Cousins putting up the numbers he does in Karl's system doesn't prove that Karl's system works; it just proves that Cousins is really, really good. And we have drastic differences in opinion regarding Koufos' quickness.
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#71
I can sure see the talent when cuz is out. I'm not sure if you have watched this team. Perhaps you have an overinflated view of the rest of the team?
Perhaps, since you referred to the NBA's assist leader and triple double leader and the NBA's 5th highest scoring SF who's putting up 18/7 as "spare parts" and a 27/11 center as just "a good player", whatever it is you use to calibrate talent is broken.

Other teams are doing more with less. Plain and simple.
 
#72
Considered, and rejected. Cousins could put up 25/10 in damned near any coach's offense. That's not a validation of the offense, it's a validation of his talent. Cousins putting up the numbers he does in Karl's system doesn't prove that Karl's system works; it just proves that Cousins is really, really good. And we have drastic differences in opinion regarding Koufos' quickness.
You know what? I agree. Cousins is that talented, that it doesn't really matter which offense we run. He will get his numbers. He can play inside. He can play outside. He can post. He can dribble and he can shoot. That some posters here would prefer him to work inside is just that - a prefered playstyle of some fans, that think going inside-outside and going big is what wins. I'm just tired of this debate. If you want to read my opinion on this, feel free to read my reply to Bajaden.
And I didn't say, that Koufos is quick. I did say, he fits Karls vision.
 
K

KingMilz

Guest
#73
Perhaps, since you referred to the NBA's assist leader and triple double leader and the NBA's 5th highest scoring SF who's putting up 18/7 as "spare parts" and a 27/11 center as just "a good player", whatever it is you use to calibrate talent is broken.

Other teams are doing more with less. Plain and simple.
Yet with all of that with all those 3 healthy we are at BEST a 500. team so far, I would think having the best big man in the NBA the assist leader and a supposed "'top 5'' SF (which he's not) the Kings would be a much better team. All those things you outlined are great for fantasy basketball but in real life it's not transferring.

Rondo/Cousins/Gay as trio is worse so far than Rubio/Wiggins/KAT when everyone is healthy in regards to wins and losses.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
#74
Yet with all of that with all those 3 healthy we are at BEST a 500. team so far, I would think having the best big man in the NBA the assist leader and a supposed "'top 5'' SF (which he's not) the Kings would be a much better team. All those things you outlined are great for fantasy basketball but in real life it's not transferring.
You misunderstand, those guys have those stats INDEPENDENT of Karl's system! But when we lose, it's because of Karl's system! In other words, everything is Karl's fault! And if not, everything is Viveks fault! :rolleyes:
 
K

KingMilz

Guest
#75
You misunderstand, those guys have those stats INDEPENDENT of Karl's system! But when we lose, it's because of Karl's system! In other words, everything is Karl's fault! And if not, everything is Viveks fault! :rolleyes:
For years it''s everyone else s fault, first it was Isaiah Thomas (I was guilty of blaming IT) yet we were roughly a 500. team with IT/Rudy/Cuz healthy than it was every coach (including the one we have now that's NEVER MISSED THE PLAYOFFS WITH A FULL SEASON), it's always everyone other than our two main guys in Rudy/Cuz/Reke.

P.S : I have indeed not been happy with GK's coaching this year but the effort of some of our better players (Rudy/DC/Ben) this year has been embarrassing.
 

Bricklayer

Don't Make Me Use The Bat
#76
Yet with all of that with all those 3 healthy we are at BEST a 500. team so far, I would think having the best big man in the NBA the assist leader and a supposed "'top 5'' SF (which he's not) the Kings would be a much better team. All those things you outlined are great for fantasy basketball but in real life it's not transferring.

Rondo/Cousins/Gay as trio is worse so far than Rubio/Wiggins/KAT when everyone is healthy in regards to wins and losses.
With Cousins we are somewhere between 5-3 and 5-5 (since Cousins missed half the Clippers game, and the final minute and OT of the Hornets game (after hobbling through the 4th). That trio has looked just fine given the chaos elsewhere. 5-3 is .625, 5-4 is .555 and 5-5 is .500.

.625 Win% would have us seeded 4th in the Conference, behind only Golden State, San Antonio and Oklahoma City
.555 Win% would have us tied with the Grizzlies for 5th/6th
.500 Win& would have us seeded 8th
 
Last edited:
K

KingMilz

Guest
#77
With Cousins we are somewhere between 5-3 and 5-5 (since Cousins missed half the Clippers game, and the final minute and OT of the Hornets game (after hobbling through the 4th). That trio has looked just fine given the chaos elsewhere. 5-3 is .625, 5-4 is .555 and 5-5 is .500.

.625 Win% would have us seeded 4th in the Conference, behind only Golden State, San Antonio and Oklahoma City
.555 Win% would have us tied with the Grizzlies for 5th/6th
.500 Win& would have us seeded 8th
Two of those wins are against 2 of the 3 worst teams in the NBA in the Lakers/Nets (who we only beat by 2), we should have beaten the Hornets in regulation so that's a loss with Cousins despite him not playing in OT and we lost to the Clippers with Cousins so if I were a betting person we would have most likely lost to them again even if Cousins played since they have owned us for years despite Cousins having godly games against them.
 

Mr. S£im Citrus

Doryphore of KingsFans.com
Staff member
#78
Two of those wins are against 2 of the 3 worst teams in the NBA in the Lakers/Nets (who we only beat by 2)
So what? Since when do wins against bad teams not count? Where are all the people ready to rise up to point out that twelve of Golden State's eighteen wins are against losing teams? Including, it should be noted, us twice, the Pelicans twice, the Nuggets twice (aka three of the six worst teams in the league), and also one each against the Nets, Sixers and lakers (the other three worst). Why should we be the only team penalized/criticized for beating the teams that we're supposed to beat?
 

rainmaker

Hall of Famer
#79
Yet with all of that with all those 3 healthy we are at BEST a 500. team so far, I would think having the best big man in the NBA the assist leader and a supposed "'top 5'' SF (which he's not) the Kings would be a much better team. All those things you outlined are great for fantasy basketball but in real life it's not transferring.
Transitioning that talent into the win/loss column is a different topic and much more drawn out conversation. There's a lot which goes into that.

Of course, nothing you said supports the idea Rondo/Rudy are "spare parts", which is a ludicrous claim. Reminds of the Reke situation where if you think Rondo/Rudy are spare parts, Reke likely would have qualified as one as well. And that spare part went on to be the key piece next to Davis as NO made the playoffs. If talent isn't transferring to more wins, look at the coach. That's essentially the job of a coach, taking the talent on hand and molding it into a team which can win. The problem here isn't Cuz is "only good" and Rondo/Rudy are spare parts. The problem is Karl's inability to fit our talent together and maximize the talent on this roster.
 
Last edited:
K

KingMilz

Guest
#80
Transitioning that talent into the win/loss column is a different topic and much more drawn out conversation. There's a lot which goes into that.

Of course, nothing you said supports the idea Rondo/Rudy are "spare parts", which is a ludicrous claim.
I don''t think Rondo or Cousins are spare parts, the other guy I would not even classify even that highly.
 

bajaden

Hall of Famer
#81
Willie is limited on offense not inept. We don't find him for lobs and when he rolls to the basket. This is why I said, that I don't know, if Willies poor offensive performances are because of coaching or lacking confidence.
But Willie is a rookie and right now it looks like we see the same old thing, that happened to all Kings rookies outside of Cuz - lack of development. Willie had a full training camp. He shouldn't be this lost on offense, he should have learned how to fight for position for rebounds. We are not talking about rookie mistakes like leaving the floor on pumpfakes. He looks like he lacks basketball fundamentals like boxing out your man. And this is worrying. I don't blame the player, but our coaching staff for this. That's their job - improve the talent we have on this roster.

Did you really miss Willie during the first quarter of tonights game versus the Warriors, when we actually defended them well until Steph got ticky tack calls and hit a couple of contested jumpshots?
Did Willie help us to slow them down in the second half?
Like Ben Willie has to earn his minutes and to do that, he has to be a defensive stopper and a force on the glass. Once I have the impression, that he is just that and still gets pulled out of the game by Karl I will happily join the majority of users here and complain about our stupid old man coaching this team the wrong way.
But I won't complain just because some kind of basketball ideology like "go big all the time", when your bigs seem to be unable to play big (in Willies case) or are both unable to guard the perimeter (like KK and Cuz) and we get crushed from the outside because of it and all of our advantage in the paint gets negated by it.
You have Duncan and Aldridge with West as a backup? Of course you play big, because every big man is able to space the floor, punish smaller guys in the post and take advantage at the glass.
You have KK, Willie and Cuz? Well now Cuz turns into a floor spacer, because KK and Willie have no jumpshot. And still people are complaining, that Cuz is misused by the coach, because he is not planted in the already overcrowded post.
And what's even worse - Willie is unable to abuse his smaller opponent on the glass.

No offense and I actually like big man, smashmouth basketball, but I have a hard time understanding how we should play this way in todays NBA with the roster we got right now.
Teach Willie how to hit a 15 foot jumper and suddenly things look way different. But instead we are teaching him to completely stay out of the way on offense and to be afraid to even touch the ball.
That's beyond me.
I understand your position, so we'll just have to agree to disagree in some areas. I know what Willie brings defensively. I watched him play for three years at Kentucky. He's a terrific help defender and pick and roll defender. In other words, put him on the floor with a Karl Towns, or a Cousins, or a Koufos, and his defensive value goes up. Put him at the center position by himself, and his value becomes much less. Now in the future when he gets stronger, that will change. Right now, he doesn't have the strength to hold position at the basket against some of the NBA centers. Someone mentioned that he was foul prone, and that's ridiculous. He's only averaging 2.4 fouls per game. If anything, he needs to be more aggressive around the basket. His offensive rebounding is terrible, and there's no excuse for it except lack of aggression.

My point is, he can be a valuable asset on defense if used properly. When they move him away from the basket on offense to get him out of the way and help spread the floor, they hurt his ability to rebound. Not a total excuse though. He needs to find a way to grab at least 3 or 4 a game.