View Poll Results: What do you think the biggest problem is for Marcus Thornton right now?

Voters
38. You may not vote on this poll
  • Tyreke Evans

    5 13.16%
  • Isaiah Thomas

    3 7.89%
  • Jimmer/Brooks

    0 0%
  • Marcus Thornton

    14 36.84%
  • Keith Smart

    16 42.11%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 50 of 50

Thread: Grades v. Hawks 02/22/2013

  1. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Spike View Post
    Please let me know how. Also, be sure to add how letting a weaker player dominate at the expense of a stronger player is a good thing.
    IT is not the weaker player, at least not offensively. If Tyreke, DMC,JT and IT took a hundred shoots each the results would be as follows:


    IT 60 points scored
    DMC 58 points
    JT 56 points
    Reke 54 points

    These are the stats, They have no bias. IT is a better offensive player than the other players. He should take the most shots.

  2. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by Npliam View Post
    IT is not the weaker player, at least not offensively. If Tyreke, DMC,JT and IT took a hundred shoots each the results would be as follows:


    IT 60 points scored
    DMC 58 points
    JT 56 points
    Reke 54 points

    These are the stats, They have no bias. IT is a better offensive player than the other players. He should take the most shots.
    Way to misuse stats. So anyone with a higher efg% should take the most shots for their team? If you really believe our offense should revolve around IT I'm not sure why anybody is going to have this debate with you.

  3. #43
    Quote Originally Posted by sdballer View Post
    Way to misuse stats. So anyone with a higher efg% should take the most shots for their team? If you really believe our offense should revolve around IT I'm not sure why anybody is going to have this debate with you.
    Go ahead and explain to me how I misused the stats. I didn't pick some random player and with very few minutes and attempts and extrapolate. I used the 4 highest scoring players on the team. These are real results, it isn't what would happen it is what is happening. The only argument that could be made against IT offensively is that those other players would be more efficient with a different point guard but there just isn't any evidence to support that. It wasn't in the starting line up and the team wasn't any better offensively.

    Defense is an entirely different issue. IT is a pretty terrible defender.

    The thing is, I am not an IT fan boy. I want Jimmer to play instead of IT because I am a Jimmer fan. T

  4. #44
    Quote Originally Posted by Npliam View Post
    Go ahead and explain to me how I misused the stats. I didn't pick some random player and with very few minutes and attempts and extrapolate. I used the 4 highest scoring players on the team. These are real results, it isn't what would happen it is what is happening. The only argument that could be made against IT offensively is that those other players would be more efficient with a different point guard but there just isn't any evidence to support that. It wasn't in the starting line up and the team wasn't any better offensively.

    Defense is an entirely different issue. IT is a pretty terrible defender.

    The thing is, I am not an IT fan boy. I want Jimmer to play instead of IT because I am a Jimmer fan. T
    You used one advanced shooting % metric to state that IT is a better offensive player than anyone else on the team and should lead the team in shots. If you don't understand how using one stat to make those kind of conclusions is absurd, I don't know what to say.

    Also, the team would be better with a different type of pg. we weren't when it wasn't starting because we don't really have a better pg to play.
    Last edited by sdballer; 02-24-2013 at 03:06 PM.

  5. #45
    Don't Make Me Use The Bat Contributor
    Moderator
    Bricklayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    32,272
    Quote Originally Posted by Npliam View Post
    IT is not the weaker player, at least not offensively. If Tyreke, DMC,JT and IT took a hundred shoots each the results would be as follows:


    IT 60 points scored
    DMC 58 points
    JT 56 points
    Reke 54 points

    These are the stats, They have no bias. IT is a better offensive player than the other players. He should take the most shots.
    Dwyane Wade: TS% .570 eFG% .520.

    Please, PLEASE tell me right now that IT is a better offensive player than Dwyane Wade and should take more shots than him. Please, just write it out here. Just say it. Then you can go away quietly.

    "Advanced" stat people are hilarious.
    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -- Arthur Schopenhauer

    "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities." --Albert Einstein

    "Petrie signings are more akin to the splash you get when you accidentally drop your toothbrush in the toilet. " -- swisshh

  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by Bricklayer View Post
    Dwyane Wade: TS% .570 eFG% .520.

    Please, PLEASE tell me right now that IT is a better offensive player than Dwyane Wade and should take more shots than him. Please, just write it out here. Just say it. Then you can go away quietly.

    "Advanced" stat people are hilarious.
    Yeah they are and you're the biggest one here.
    "Dealing with the Maloofs is like dealing with the North Koreans, except less competent." -- Chris Lehane, Director of Think Big

    "Size doesn't make any difference; heart is what makes a difference." -- Jerry Sloan.

  7. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Bricklayer View Post
    Dwyane Wade: TS% .570 eFG% .520.

    Please, PLEASE tell me right now that IT is a better offensive player than Dwyane Wade and should take more shots than him. Please, just write it out here. Just say it. Then you can go away quietly.

    "Advanced" stat people are hilarious.
    IT is more efficient than Dwayne Wade.

    Now it is your turn to tell my why he isn't.

    I am not saying that I would rather have IT than Dwayne Wade. Wade is a much better player, he is a better rebounded, better passer and a way better defender. If you are going to talk strictly who scores the ball best per possession then IT is slightly better.

  8. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by LWP777 View Post
    Yeah they are and you're the biggest one here.
    No he isn't. He uses stats to back up his bias, not to create it.

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Npliam View Post
    IT is more efficient than Dwayne Wade.

    Now it is your turn to tell my why he isn't.

    I am not saying that I would rather have IT than Dwayne Wade. Wade is a much better player, he is a better rebounded, better passer and a way better defender. If you are going to talk strictly who scores the ball best per possession then IT is slightly better.
    See, here is the problem with forums. They record the less than well thought out stuff that sometimes spills out of our brains. Your argument just a few posts above claims that IT is a BETTER offensive player than anyone else on the kings due to his shooting percentages, not more efficient. Do you still think IT is a better offensive player than anyone that shoots a lower efg, including Dwade or are we backing off to a much less ridiculous and mostly irrelevant points per possession debate?

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by Bricklayer View Post
    Dwyane Wade: TS% .570 eFG% .520.

    Please, PLEASE tell me right now that IT is a better offensive player than Dwyane Wade and should take more shots than him. Please, just write it out here. Just say it. Then you can go away quietly.

    "Advanced" stat people are hilarious.
    IT is more efficient than Tyreke. You can whine, scream, kick all you want but there's nothing to change that fact. The numbers back it up. Since IT and Reke are taking equal shots right now as well, yes, that makes IT the most efficient/effective scorer on the team.

    Whether he should be taking equal shots with Reke/Boogie or if Reke is beingused incorrectly is an entirely different argument. However, the beauty of numbers is you can't change them to fit anopinion. They remain unbiased, unlike our opinions.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •