Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 101 to 120 of 133

Thread: David Stern's presser and latest news, rumors, etc.

  1. #101
    Senior Member Contributor kennadog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Valley of the Kings
    Posts
    13,665
    I quit reading any Sonics sites or comments anywhere. First, I do not believe that Sonics fans who post online are representative of all Sonics fans.

    However, I no longer look for the Sonic fans comments/posts online, because I have found far too many of them to be be self-righteous, rude, snobbish @$$holes. They talk about Oklahoma City and Sacramento (as cities) like they are sh*t on the shoes of the amazingly and stunningly superior Seattle. And they do act like the world has never seen fans better than them.

    I have always felt sorry for Seattle losing the Sonics and wished it had never happened. I have supported the idea of Seattle getting a chance to have another team. After slogging through so much vitriol and superiority directed at Sacramento and Oklahoma City, I almost don't care anymore if they ever get another NBA team. I said almost, because I don't believe that these kinds of posters represent to majority. At least, I sincerely hope not.
    PROUD OF SACRAMENTO. PROUD TO BE A KINGS FAN.

  2. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Section 101 View Post
    Why not have a Kings #7 with Johnson or KJ on the back?
    its a cool idea, but i prefer authentic jerseys, not really a fan of personalized ones

  3. #103
    Senior Member Schmoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    146
    I liked this:

    “I can just tell you that everyone I talked to — and I am not going to be specific — but everyone is rooting for Sacramento,” said Mayor Johnson.
    Link

  4. #104
    Quote Originally Posted by kennadog View Post
    I quit reading any Sonics sites or comments anywhere. First, I do not believe that Sonics fans who post online are representative of all Sonics fans.

    However, I no longer look for the Sonic fans comments/posts online, because I have found far too many of them to be be self-righteous, rude, snobbish @$$holes. They talk about Oklahoma City and Sacramento (as cities) like they are sh*t on the shoes of the amazingly and stunningly superior Seattle. And they do act like the world has never seen fans better than them.

    I have always felt sorry for Seattle losing the Sonics and wished it had never happened. I have supported the idea of Seattle getting a chance to have another team. After slogging through so much vitriol and superiority directed at Sacramento and Oklahoma City, I almost don't care anymore if they ever get another NBA team. I said almost, because I don't believe that these kinds of posters represent to majority. At least, I sincerely hope not.
    That is why I said we should be done with saying "oh, Seattle deserves a team and I hope they get a team" every time we talk about the situation. The team that they deserve is in OKC and really, they should've went through with the lawsuit against Clay Bennett at that time when they found out he lied the entire time.

    I've read the comments from Seattle fans too and they don't care about Sac losing the team. They think they deserve to to take the team and tag on their own colors and history and end the Royals/Kings franchise essentially forever.

  5. #105
    If KJ's plans are moving along as planned, we will know what he has up his sleeve within a week with that self-imposed March 1 deadline fast approaching. I am like a kid waiting for Christmas. I know KJ has something in store that will knock the socks off the NBA and everyone else BUT I just cannot wait to find out what it is exactly!
    Jim Capers once called a foul on me while I was sitting on the bench. Tweet! "Foul, number fifty-three! Five-three!" Everybody was confused and looking around for number 53, so I stood up and said, "I'm over here and the only thing I'm fouling is the water bottle." - Darryl Dawkins

  6. #106
    Senior Member HndsmCelt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Big "NO" (FresNO)
    Posts
    9,010
    Interesting tidbit:
    Aaron Bruski ‏@aaronbruski

    SAC City Manager John Shirey: We have met with an investment group that is willing to purchase the Kings."
    Retweeted by Carmichael Dave
    Expand

    "Line up a long shot maybe try it two times, maybe more
    Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor
    Why hold out for more?

    Here comes sunshine, here comes sunshine"
    -The Grateful Dead


  7. #107
    The cake is a lie. Contributor
    Moderator
    Warhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    38.3 deg N, 121.3 deg W
    Posts
    11,243
    Quote Originally Posted by HndsmCelt View Post
    Interesting tidbit:
    Aaron Bruski ‏@aaronbruski

    SAC City Manager John Shirey: We have met with an investment group that is willing to purchase the Kings."
    Retweeted by Carmichael Dave
    Expand
    I don't know when he posted that, but he (Shirey) basically said the same thing tonight in the Sacramento City Council meeting we were at.
    Sacramento Kings - 2013 - the future starts NOW!

    Long live the SACRAMENTO Kings!

  8. #108
    Senior Member xrzn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    LALA land -_-
    Posts
    1,970
    Symbolic measure passes 7-2. No votes are from Fong and McCarty. Were these no votes expected?

    Quote Originally Posted by Warhawk View Post
    I don't know when he posted that, but he (Shirey) basically said the same thing tonight in the Sacramento City Council meeting we were at.
    Just checked his twitter, says an hour ago.

  9. #109
    Senior Member Gary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    6,544
    Quote Originally Posted by xrzn View Post
    Symbolic measure passes 7-2. No votes are from Fong and McCarty. Were these no votes expected?



    Just checked his twitter, says an hour ago.
    they voted for the arena again and won 7-2?

    And yes those no votes were expected. I think Fong though voted yes last time but was a dick when voting yes. Mccarty does not strike me as a guy that even likes sports if you catch my drift. He seems a bit feminine to me. Not that it matters but I don't expect him to understand anything to do with sports. I hope that others will vote down what he wants just to let him know how dumb he's being.
    THANK YOU MAYOR JOHNSON!
    Thank you Vivek Ranadive!
    Thank you Carmichael Dave!
    Thank you Mike!
    Thank you every other minority owner!

    You all saved the Sacramento Kings! Long live Sacramento!

  10. #110
    Senior Member HndsmCelt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The Big "NO" (FresNO)
    Posts
    9,010
    What I found most encouraging was not the vote, although it will be vital to have a solid arena deal to take to the BOG, was the statement "we have met with an investment group that wants to buy the Kings..." It means that the investors are at the point that they are working as a unified group, taking meetings and getting this thing done!

    "Line up a long shot maybe try it two times, maybe more
    Good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor
    Why hold out for more?

    Here comes sunshine, here comes sunshine"
    -The Grateful Dead


  11. #111
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    they voted for the arena again and won 7-2?

    And yes those no votes were expected. I think Fong though voted yes last time but was a dick when voting yes. Mccarty does not strike me as a guy that even likes sports if you catch my drift. He seems a bit feminine to me. Not that it matters but I don't expect him to understand anything to do with sports. I hope that others will vote down what he wants just to let him know how dumb he's being.
    McCarty used to have season tickets.
    All in all you're just another brick in the wall. - Pink Floyd

  12. #112
    Senior Member The Hammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lewiston Freaking IDAHO Baby!!
    Posts
    2,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Warhawk View Post
    I don't know when he posted that, but he (Shirey) basically said the same thing tonight in the Sacramento City Council meeting we were at.
    Shocker it's not on ESPN.

    ... More seriously, for anybody sincerely following this story, they know that there is a slim to nil chance the Kings leave. People like John Shirey are not in the business of blowing smoke. The big media announcement seems to be being preceded by ho-hum, across the table, sober statements among people who matter about the business at hand: that the Kings have a local buyer. Big deal I guess... right?
    Big picture.

  13. #113
    Senior Member The Hammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lewiston Freaking IDAHO Baby!!
    Posts
    2,374
    Quote Originally Posted by Gary View Post
    they voted for the arena again and won 7-2?

    And yes those no votes were expected. I think Fong though voted yes last time but was a dick when voting yes. Mccarty does not strike me as a guy that even likes sports if you catch my drift. He seems a bit feminine to me. Not that it matters but I don't expect him to understand anything to do with sports. I hope that others will vote down what he wants just to let him know how dumb he's being.
    No gay slurs. Knock it off.
    Big picture.

  14. #114
    Senior Member The Hammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Lewiston Freaking IDAHO Baby!!
    Posts
    2,374
    Quote Originally Posted by xrzn View Post
    Symbolic measure passes 7-2. No votes are from Fong and McCarty. Were these no votes expected?



    Just checked his twitter, says an hour ago.
    The way I read this vote, and the timing of the vote is just another layer of armor in the iron-clad case KJ is building to keep the team. Now he can not only point to a deal voted on a year ago, but that it was re-affirmed. We now basically have a "Yes" and a super recent "Hell yes" for an arena plan. Seattle has a "Oh heck yeah we want to but we just need to deal with two law suits and an environmental review." Even if Stern wanted to keep the Kings here for other (important) reasons, KJ is just making it so easy for him to do so. He's giving him all his reasons. Anybody aspiring for a career in politics, watch and learn. This guy is so freaking on his game it's scary.
    Big picture.

  15. #115
    The cake is a lie. Contributor
    Moderator
    Warhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    38.3 deg N, 121.3 deg W
    Posts
    11,243
    Quote Originally Posted by The Hammer View Post
    The way I read this vote, and the timing of the vote is just another layer of armor in the iron-clad case KJ is building to keep the team. Now he can not only point to a deal voted on a year ago, but that it was re-affirmed. We now basically have a "Yes" and a super recent "Hell yes" for an arena plan. Seattle has a "Oh heck yeah we want to but we just need to deal with two law suits and an environmental review." Even if Stern wanted to keep the Kings here for other (important) reasons, KJ is just making it so easy for him to do so. He's giving him all his reasons. Anybody aspiring for a career in politics, watch and learn. This guy is so freaking on his game it's scary.
    I've said this before. KJ has been the master in all of these Kings dealings.

    He knows it is often the little steps that build a big case for something. You lay out a time frame and tackle it in attainable chunks. You build a case from many directions and cut the enemy off at the knees. You under promise and over deliver.

    In the case for keeping the team from moving to Anaheim, not only does he show up with an impassioned plea to keep the team, he drops $10 million in the team's lap to show they aren't doing their marketing job and has Burkle (the potential buyer) in his pocket to prove the market is worthy of an investment.
    Boom.
    I hope he is doing something similar here and really just knocks it out of the park.
    Sacramento Kings - 2013 - the future starts NOW!

    Long live the SACRAMENTO Kings!

  16. #116
    Senior Member Contributor Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Citrus Heights
    Posts
    6,413
    I think they needed a re-vote because the council has changed since the election. Is that right about the change in membership?
    Upwards and onwards.

  17. #117
    The cake is a lie. Contributor
    Moderator
    Warhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    38.3 deg N, 121.3 deg W
    Posts
    11,243
    "I can see a whale sighting. I can't tell you how close to shore, but I can see it." -Sacramento mayor Kevin Johnson
    According to James Ham (twitter) at tonight's game.
    Sacramento Kings - 2013 - the future starts NOW!

    Long live the SACRAMENTO Kings!

  18. #118
    Senior Member Contributor Tetsujin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sacramento/Davis
    Posts
    7,075
    Quote Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
    I think they needed a re-vote because the council has changed since the election. Is that right about the change in membership?
    Yes there has been a change in council membership with Rob Fong and Sandy Shemaloof being replaced by Allen Warren (the head of the ad hoc arena committee) and Steve Hansen (no relation to Chris Hansen...I think). That said, what wound up happening is that one of the original two "No" votes remaining a no (Mccarty, who was probably going to be a no regardless of the circumstances) and the least positive "Yes" vote from the first one (D. Fong, who has at least shown a willingness accept an arena deal in the past). So what has happened overall is a general shift in the vote make-up from two resolute NO votes to one entrenched No and a No capable of being changed. That said, it'll never come down to a close vote so long as the seven yes votes remain in their district seats for the near future ( KJ, Ashby, Cohn, Jay, Warren are all essentially automatic Yes votes, guaranteeing the five votes needed to pass any necessary decision through a council meeting).
    Quote Originally Posted by MassachusettsKingsFan View Post
    I know this is going to sound insane, but Bill Walton is about 500million times more tolerable when you're a beating the defending champions by 20.

  19. #119
    Senior Member Contributor kennadog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Valley of the Kings
    Posts
    13,665
    Be aware that tonight's vote was symbolic. They did not "approve" anything. Basically, because there is nothing to approve yet. According to KJ many of the local governments in the region are also passing resolutions this week supporting every reasonable effort to keep the Kings and build a new arena, because they are important assets to the whole region.

    The biggest item that will have to be voted on is again authorizing the use of parking facilities/revenues to raise up to $255 million as the city's contribution. By the way, the city has not made any final determination on whether they will sell a long term lease of certain city parking facilities to a private company or whether the city might just continue to own and operate themselves. The first option means a private company pays for the whole lease up front (say 30 years). The city would then have cash for their contribution to the deal. I'm assuming that if they'd rather keep operating the parking themselves, they might vote to issue revenue-backed bonds.to raise the city funding amount. Parking revenues would then be committed first to making the bond payments.

    It will have to be voted on again, because the parties to the deal are different than one year ago. No more Maloofs. So last year's approval is not the same deal.

    Actually, most see the changes on the city council as strengthening KJ's position. Hansen and Warren are seen as less antagonistic and closer to KJ in viewpoint.Of course, that remains to be seen. If a good solid deal can be had for a new arena to keep the Kings, I have faith the council will vote yes, although probably not unanimously.

    What bothered me tonight about Hansens' comments at the end, was he characterized the speakers as made up of people against any public funds for an arena and people wanting an arena and the Kings at any cost. To me, that was a gross misstatement of Crown Downtown's position. Actually we want a downtown arena for basketball and all the other events we'll lose. I would be heartbroken if we lose the Kings, but I'd be even more heartbroken if Sacramento no longer has an arena venue for all the events we get at the arena.

    If we lost the Kings, I'd still want a new arena downtown. The fact is, and AEG confirmed this, Sacramento can't get an arena deal that will pencil out without an anchor tenant like the Kings already on board. My city stands to lose a whole lot more than a basketball team.

    However, I do not support keeping the Kings at any cost to the city. If the city can't get a deal that is soundly underwritten on conservative projections, that sufficiently ties the Kings to Sacramento for a long time and that protects the general fund, then I'm not going to be in favor of it either.
    PROUD OF SACRAMENTO. PROUD TO BE A KINGS FAN.

  20. #120
    Senior Member Schmoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    146
    I shutter to think where we'd be if Heather Fargo were at the helm still.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •