PROUD OF SACRAMENTO. PROUD TO BE A KINGS FAN.
Regarding today's alleged meeting between Burkle and Stern, I wonder if a large part of the face-to-face meeting was to gauge Burkle's long term interest in the franchise. Is he just doing this in the short term to save the team or is he in it for the long haul? That's something the league may really want to know. For example, he partnered to buy the Penguins then, after the Arena was built and all was good again, he kind of faded into the background.
Meeting was yesterday. Burkle is still an active NHL owner for the Penguins. Article re the NHL lock out.
http://www.cbssports.com/nhl/blog/ey...or-nhl-lockout
What's interesting to consider here is that Burkle was one of the owners who was brought into the players/owners-only meetings back in December that seemed to bridge a few gaps that helped get to the eventual deal. When he came into the picture, Burkle was seen as a very player-friendly owner and was itching to get a deal done. The opening two lines of the apology read like they come from an owner who tried his best and was dismayed he couldn't help get something done at that time.
Last edited by kennadog; 01-25-2013 at 05:56 PM.
PROUD OF SACRAMENTO. PROUD TO BE A KINGS FAN.
Can't blame him. Compare a classy professional businessman of Burkle's stature who has "real money" and stability compared to Moe, Larry, and Curly. Those three jokers have squandered their family wealth through bimbos, booze, and betting. Not that I'm against any of these mind you, but you dont base your entire portfolio on them. A little moderation on their part could have gone a long way and saved everyone a lot of grief, including themselves. (I'm guessing that they wish they had not spent all that money on that Carls Jr. commercial. I mean really...who does that but idiots.) I look forward to having an owner that is less flamboyant and more conservative who would rather build and run a team the right way instead of making themselves the focal point of the franchise.
SI reporting now, based on Amick. Good to get high level exposure on this: http://tracking.si.com/2013/01/26/nb...le/?xid=si_nba
I like the Downtown Plaza better also. It will reinvigorate the whole K street area big time. I do however disagree with you on light rail. I think lots of people will use it, especially when they will be fighting to find parking as all the parking lots are scattered all over. Light rail actually passes right next to Downtown plaza on 7th or 8th street I think. At most people would only have to walk a block. When they finish the extension to the airport, alot of people will use it from the Natomas area. Nothing better than taking BART to a A's or Raiders game where it drops you off right at the stadium. It is a huge advantage to have mass transit right there and I know people will take advantage of it in Sacramento.
Just tweeted by Amick that Burkle was in Sacramento on Wednesday..
I'll add the link to the story once Sam fixes it.
Link: http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/1865501
Last edited by Proof21; 01-25-2013 at 08:19 PM.
One other idea I had hoped might be possible. A special train from Roseville to the Sac Depot. It works for either arena location, but perfect for the railyard. Given that parking will be at least $20 down there, I bet they could fill a bunch of cars with fans willing to pay less than that. Some cities have pretty good success with regional train service.
stevelarge_cbs13 @largesteven
Cook says he believes Maloofs would agree to sell to local Sacramento investors if NBA blocks Seattle deal.
---------------
take that for what it's worth.
"I want the community to know that we're going to fight like crazy to get to where we need to be."
– Kevin Johnson, reacting to reports of a potential sale of the Kings to a Seattle group
What's the difference between ignorance and indifference? I don't know and don't care.![]()
Bookmarks