Page 19 of 19 FirstFirst ... 9171819
Results 361 to 379 of 379

Thread: Seattle rumors/comments - post them here!

  1. #361
    Senior Member Contributor Tetsujin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Sacramento/Davis
    Posts
    7,074
    Quote Originally Posted by Kings Faithful View Post
    I wish we could retire his jersey.
    Nothing would stop that from happening. I mean, Miami retired Michael Jordan's jersey despite him having not ever played for them.
    Quote Originally Posted by MassachusettsKingsFan View Post
    I know this is going to sound insane, but Bill Walton is about 500million times more tolerable when you're a beating the defending champions by 20.

  2. #362
    Regarding the ownership of the Arena if the team is sold to local investors, the local investors would own it. The arena and property would be part of the sale. Think about it. If the new owner(s) assumes the 77M debt - of which the arena and surrounding property is collateral - then they also assume ownership of the building and the property it rests upon. Didn't Jim Thomas own it until the Maloofs bought him out? Same logic would apply to another ownership change.

  3. #363
    Quote Originally Posted by KingsFanSince85 View Post
    Regarding the ownership of the Arena if the team is sold to local investors, the local investors would own it. The arena and property would be part of the sale. Think about it. If the new owner(s) assumes the 77M debt - of which the arena and surrounding property is collateral - then they also assume ownership of the building and the property it rests upon. Didn't Jim Thomas own it until the Maloofs bought him out? Same logic would apply to another ownership change.
    Makes sense. Thanks.

  4. #364
    Senior Member Contributor kennadog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Valley of the Kings
    Posts
    13,653
    Well, there is one ownership for the team and one for the arena, actually. The city also has a $25 million dollar stake in the team as part of the collateral for the city loan. I think a local buyer would assume the city loan from the arena ownership, which would make them the arena owners. And it would likely be a great deal for the Maloofs, because the collateral, especially the arena might not be worth the current loan amount that would come due if the team moves.

    I don't want Van Dusan as the buyer, because he wants to keep the ST arena and renovate it. I think that's a stupid idea and not in the city's best interest.
    PROUD OF SACRAMENTO. PROUD TO BE A KINGS FAN.

  5. #365
    The cake is a lie. Contributor
    Moderator
    Warhawk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    38.3 deg N, 121.3 deg W
    Posts
    11,216
    Quote Originally Posted by kennadog View Post
    Well, there is one ownership for the team and one for the arena, actually. The city also has a $25 million dollar stake in the team as part of the collateral for the city loan. I think a local buyer would assume the city loan from the arena ownership, which would make them the arena owners. And it would likely be a great deal for the Maloofs, because the collateral, especially the arena might not be worth the current loan amount that would come due if the team moves.

    I don't want Van Dusan as the buyer, because he wants to keep the ST arena and renovate it. I think that's a stupid idea and not in the city's best interest.
    I wonder if any of that is his response to MSE as a way to keep the team in Sacramento. I haven't heard if he has ever said that is his preferred option or just an option. He seems pretty "gung ho" about it though....
    Sacramento Kings - 2013 - the future starts NOW!

    Long live the SACRAMENTO Kings!

  6. #366
    I doubt the NBA would look kindly on any buyer not having a viable arena plan.

  7. #367
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by Warhawk View Post
    I wonder if any of that is his response to MSE as a way to keep the team in Sacramento. I haven't heard if he has ever said that is his preferred option or just an option. He seems pretty "gung ho" about it though....
    I suspect that it was just a way to keep the team in Sacramento. I don't recall the earlier news reports when he was talking about the current dump being able to be renovated/refurbished mentioning his desire to outright buying the team (but then again my memory isn't the greatest anymore).

  8. #368
    Senior Member nebs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    2,326
    Quote Originally Posted by whozit View Post
    I suspect that it was just a way to keep the team in Sacramento. I don't recall the earlier news reports when he was talking about the current dump being able to be renovated/refurbished mentioning his desire to outright buying the team (but then again my memory isn't the greatest anymore).
    I saw him in one of the studio newsrooms the other day and he was interviewed. He was definitely all about buying the team and renovating the Sleep Train.

  9. #369
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    919
    Quote Originally Posted by nebs View Post
    I saw him in one of the studio newsrooms the other day and he was interviewed. He was definitely all about buying the team and renovating the Sleep Train.
    That's more recent than what I was referring to as "earlier news reports." He had been in and out of the news about the ability to renovate the current facilities since the "agreement" for the downtown arena was scuttled by the most beloved of all Maloofs, Georgie boy.

  10. #370
    Quote Originally Posted by Brac-o-matic View Post
    It seems to me that they specifically DON'T want to sell to Sacramento. If they did, they would have contacted us about the fact that the team was for sale, and not made a deal with Seattle behind our backs. However, lucky for us, they don't have the final word- the NBA does. And if we can put together a competitive, credible offer to rival Seattle's, then I think it would make it a LOT harder for the NBA to approve the move.
    That's possible, but I think the dynamic is George looking for ways to make become unbroke, giving up on the idea of moving the team while keeping ownership, then listening to offers. Perhaps he had heard the rough outlines of offers from the Sacramento investors before and they were too low, so he engaged with Seattle.

    But you're right in that convincing the board of governors that there is an equally viable offer that keeps the team in town with a new arena would be ideal.

  11. #371
    Senior Member Contributor kennadog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Valley of the Kings
    Posts
    13,653
    Quote Originally Posted by Warhawk View Post
    I wonder if any of that is his response to MSE as a way to keep the team in Sacramento. I haven't heard if he has ever said that is his preferred option or just an option. He seems pretty "gung ho" about it though....
    I think I read it in a Bee article. Will have to go find it.
    PROUD OF SACRAMENTO. PROUD TO BE A KINGS FAN.

  12. #372
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Roseville, California
    Posts
    172
    Aaron Bruski ‏@aaronbruski

    Sacramento is the favorite to keep the Kings in my eyes based on conversations with sources close to the situation.
    Expand

  13. #373
    I stopped listening to "bruski" after he said "JAMES JOHNSON DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE ON AN NBA FLOOR" And his very next tweet was "he could be a player though in the right team"

    uhhhh. Mr Hyperbole. zzzzzzzzzz

  14. #374
    Quote Originally Posted by nebs View Post
    I saw him in one of the studio newsrooms the other day and he was interviewed. He was definitely all about buying the team and renovating the Sleep Train.
    I don't believe that will ever get it done. NBA would turn its back.

    Right not now I'm hoping that our best REALISTIC chance is if Stern and Co say to themselves "wait a minute... if we play our cards right we can have it ALL. Burkle money, Hansen money, Maloofs, gone, new arena in Sac, new arena in Seattle = Sell Kings to sac group, and give Seattle an expansion team".

    If it comes down to simple Sac vs Seattle, or Hansen vs Burkle... I don't love our chances at all. And if keeping the team in Sac with a sleep train renovation means no Hansen and zero new arenas... well... how you you vote if you are on the BOG? come on.

  15. #375
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    I don't believe that will ever get it done. NBA would turn its back.

    Right not now I'm hoping that our best REALISTIC chance is if Stern and Co say to themselves "wait a minute... if we play our cards right we can have it ALL. Burkle money, Hansen money, Maloofs, gone, new arena in Sac, new arena in Seattle = Sell Kings to sac group, and give Seattle an expansion team"..
    A great way for Stern to exit. It's like a perfect storm scenario is right at his fingertips. The end result could be his masterpiece, his Swan Song.
    Last edited by VF21; 01-13-2013 at 11:56 AM.

  16. #376
    Senior Member bajaden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    baja, mexico
    Posts
    13,445
    Quote Originally Posted by UK_King View Post
    I stopped listening to "bruski" after he said "JAMES JOHNSON DOESN'T DESERVE TO BE ON AN NBA FLOOR" And his very next tweet was "he could be a player though in the right team"

    uhhhh. Mr Hyperbole. zzzzzzzzzz
    Don't confuse Bruski's basketball knowledge with the knowledge of the current ownership situation. He's been on top of this from the beginning, and for the most part, he's been very accurate. Basketball oppinion is subjective, but for the most part, whats happening now is hopefully based on factual information. As much as that is possible with the Maloof's. It would be like saying a attorney isn't good at his job because of his lack of basketball knowledge.
    Its hard to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.

    Hard work beats talent, when talent doesn't work hard.

  17. #377
    Carmichael Dave ‏@CarmichaelDave
    Here's to today being the first of TWO gut wrenching losses for Seattle this week.

  18. #378
    Quote Originally Posted by bajaden View Post
    Don't confuse Bruski's basketball knowledge with the knowledge of the current ownership situation. He's been on top of this from the beginning, and for the most part, he's been very accurate. Basketball oppinion is subjective, but for the most part, whats happening now is hopefully based on factual information. As much as that is possible with the Maloof's. It would be like saying a attorney isn't good at his job because of his lack of basketball knowledge.
    Well he is a basketball reporter.... or so i assumed. Before this Seattle story broke his twitter feed was just full of ridiculous hyperbole about this player and that.

    When things like this happen it really is hard to know who's on top of anything.

    you've got some reporters saying this is over, some saying it's not even started, so who's correct? Hard to say really.

  19. #379
    Dalek Vlade Contributor
    Moderator
    VF21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    In the TARDIS
    Posts
    73,480
    Quote Originally Posted by Reke 13 Havoc View Post
    Carmichael Dave ‏@CarmichaelDave
    Here's to today being the first of TWO gut wrenching losses for Seattle this week.
    LOVE IT!

    I've started a new thread for all the rumors, articles, thoughts, etc. on the whole sale scenario. If people will use the one thread, we won't have two threads at cross purposes.

    Thanks all!
    SACRAMENTO KINGS - A Family Tradition - The passion runs deep with fans of this team.

    Why is the rum always gone? --
    Cap'n Jack Sparrow

    THANK YOU KEVIN JOHNSON! #WeAreSacramento - May 17, 2013

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •