
Originally Posted by
bajaden
I never thought I'd defend Bricky, but I think your offbase here. Bricky hasn't declared any love for Cousins the man, but with the potential of Cousins the player, and what that value could be to the franchise. Whether you happen to agree or not, that Cousins is a rare commodity that doesn't come around very often, is immaterial, because its subjective. Some of us think thats the case, and some don't, and some simply don't care either way. But there's a distinct difference between looking at a franchise's value, and a player that could be a difference maker, and being in love with the player himself, or his actions.
What Bricky stated, about some players having a personal relationship with the owners of a team, happens to be true, and thats not in any way a defense of the Maloofs. Its just stating facts, and in this particular case, the possible decision of the Maloofs not to trade Cousins, is a good one in Bricky's opinion. But thats hardly an endorsement of the Maloofs. They just happened to make the right decision in this case. At least as far as Bricky is concerned. And, at least for now, I happen to agree with him. Its rare for any kneejerk decision to be a good one. Its always best to let the fires cool down, the smoke clear, and then decide what you want to do.
Now where I disagree with the Maloofs is with their reinstatement of Cousins without even consulting Petrie, or talking to him at all. But apparently the two sides have been on the outs for some time now, so maybe it wasn't that unusual for them. The person getting jerked around in all of this, and no surprise here, is Cousins. Because of the internal feuding within the orginization, there's no cohesiveness, just chaos. As someone on another website said, if you raise a dog with a pack of wolves, don't be surprised if your dog acts like a wolf. Point being, the current inviorment is hardly the place for a troubled young man with problems to solve those problems.
Bookmarks