View Poll Results: Kings Player of the Game?

Voters
45. You may not vote on this poll
  • Cousins

    3 6.67%
  • Thornton

    0 0%
  • Johnson

    31 68.89%
  • Brooks

    0 0%
  • Fredette

    11 24.44%
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 61 to 68 of 68

Thread: Grades v. Knicks 12/28/2012

  1. #61
    Senior Member Contributor
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Sacramento
    Posts
    1,855
    Quote Originally Posted by jpsls View Post
    But Petrie always has to go with the safe pick. It's why I feel he needs to go.
    Safe pick, my a&&. There's your pick and his pick but no " safe" pick.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by MassachusettsKingsFan View Post
    Agreed. Which is why I think Drummond would have been a good pick for us.
    Just like the second-guessing about the Kawhi Leonard pick, the Drummond pick only looks like a miss with the benefit of hindsight. Drummond's development may, very well, have looked very different in Sacramento than it has in Detroit. The biggest question mark about Drummond prior to the draft was about what was between his ears. Put a raw talent like that in a franchise that has been notable the last 7 years for failing to develop young talent and next to a volatile young star in the frontcourt, and his "potential" would stay potential.

    Also, can you imagine what his offense would have looked like had Keith Smart given him a solid green light on any open shot at the beginning of the season like he did with the rest of our players?

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Hadlowe View Post
    Just like the second-guessing about the Kawhi Leonard pick, the Drummond pick only looks like a miss with the benefit of hindsight. Drummond's development may, very well, have looked very different in Sacramento than it has in Detroit. The biggest question mark about Drummond prior to the draft was about what was between his ears. Put a raw talent like that in a franchise that has been notable the last 7 years for failing to develop young talent and next to a volatile young star in the frontcourt, and his "potential" would stay potential.

    Also, can you imagine what his offense would have looked like had Keith Smart given him a solid green light on any open shot at the beginning of the season like he did with the rest of our players?
    Not sure I agree as a great deal of the posters on this board were against both moves long before the players proved them right. Yes, Smart sucks as a coach and would have probably stunted the development of anyone we picked. But I still go with the guys that have translatable skills and nba bodies/positions every day.

    Fact, unless something drastically changes, we probably screwed both those picks up.

  4. #64
    Harrison Barnes was the pick we should have gone for not T-Rob, he has potential and is the perfect fit we needed at the SF.

  5. #65
    Senior Member Contributor Glenn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Citrus Heights
    Posts
    6,361
    Quote Originally Posted by andremiller07 View Post
    Harrison Barnes was the pick we should have gone for not T-Rob, he has potential and is the perfect fit we needed at the SF.
    Maybe. Depending on who was dictating who our pick, let's assume Petrie had the final say just for giggles, he knows shooters and I would trust his opinion.
    Upwards and onwards.

  6. #66
    Don't Make Me Use The Bat Contributor
    Moderator
    Bricklayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Posts
    32,264
    Quote Originally Posted by andremiller07 View Post
    Harrison Barnes was the pick we should have gone for not T-Rob, he has potential and is the perfect fit we needed at the SF.
    What potnetial I wonder. he slipped so far because peopel began to realize his high end might be Jeff Green.

    Drummond was the pick. Played the same poisition as the guy we picked, except his skill package was much more aligned with what we should ahve been looking for, and his body/athleticism was a impressive as anybody had seen. We had him in for workouts. There simply is no excuse for missing on him given all that other than that you just simply missed and went for the name instead.

    I would love to resort to the "what's done is done" foxhole on this one, but its oen fo several moves or nonmoves in recent years that have deeply hurt me. I could see a Cousins/Drummond frontline, could see what that could have meant for a very very long time. It all fell into place draft night, all you gotta do is call the name into Stern...and we won't ever get that opportunity again. One last too small "big" on your way out the door, eh Geoff? Ignore the long shotblocker one last time for old time's sake? Idiot.
    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." -- Arthur Schopenhauer

    "Great spirits have always found violent opposition from mediocrities." --Albert Einstein

    "Petrie signings are more akin to the splash you get when you accidentally drop your toothbrush in the toilet. " -- swisshh

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Bricklayer View Post
    What potnetial I wonder. he slipped so far because peopel began to realize his high end might be Jeff Green.
    well ill definitely take Jeff Green over T-Rob any day of the week.........


    but i do agree if he wanted to draft a big man it should have been Drummond

  8. #68
    James Johnson's game winner just bourght back a memory, when he was in his first preseason with the Bulls he also had a fade-away tough 2 point to win the game for the Bulls and he did so you could say hes got form lol

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-t1-uQeQ7w

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •